Before launching a new product or entering a new market, smart companies ask a critical legal question: are we free to operate? A freedom-to-operate analysis (FTO analysis) is a comprehensive review of existing patents to assess whether your planned product or process infringes any valid patent held by a third party. At PerspireIP, we conduct freedom-to-operate analyses for clients across a wide range of industries. This guide explains how the process works and how to use the results to protect your business.<\/p>\n\n
A freedom-to-operate analysis \u2014 also called an FTO opinion, clearance search, or right-to-use analysis \u2014 is a legal assessment of whether a proposed product or process can be commercialized without infringing valid, enforceable patents held by others. The analysis involves identifying relevant third-party patents, analyzing whether the claims of those patents read on your proposed product or process, and assessing the validity and enforceability of any patents that appear to be infringed. The result is an FTO opinion that characterizes your risk and recommends strategies to mitigate it.<\/p>\n
A freedom-to-operate analysis is distinct from a patentability or novelty search. A novelty search looks for prior art that affects whether you can get a patent. An FTO analysis looks for patents that might block you from practicing your own technology, regardless of whether you have a patent. You can have a patented invention that still infringes someone else’s patent \u2014 for example, a pioneering patent blocking a genus of inventions, with your specific embodiment also covered by a patent held by a different party.<\/p>\n\n
The ideal time to conduct a freedom-to-operate analysis is before significant investment in product development or commercialization. Specifically, FTO analyses are most valuable at the following stages:<\/p>\n
A thorough freedom-to-operate analysis involves several systematic steps that PerspireIP follows for every FTO engagement.<\/p>\n
The FTO analysis begins with a detailed technical description of the specific product or process you plan to commercialize. The more specific and detailed this description, the more targeted and reliable the FTO analysis will be. Vague or overly broad product descriptions lead to vague FTO opinions that provide little actionable guidance. PerspireIP typically begins with a detailed technical interview and review of product specifications, design documents, and prototypes.<\/p>\n
The next step is identifying all potentially relevant patents through a comprehensive search of patent databases. The search uses keywords, patent classification codes, assignee names (targeting known competitors), and inventor names to identify the universe of potentially relevant patents. For products with complex technology, the patent landscape may include hundreds or thousands of potentially relevant patents across multiple technology areas.<\/p>\n
After identifying the initial set of potentially relevant patents, an experienced attorney screens them to identify those that are most likely to present infringement risk. Factors considered include the technology area of the patent (is it in the same technical field as the product?), the filing date (has the patent expired?), the geographic scope (does it cover the countries where you plan to commercialize?), and the apparent claim scope (do the claims appear to be directed to something similar to your product?).<\/p>\n
For each patent that survives the screening phase, the attorney performs a detailed claim mapping \u2014 comparing each element of the patent’s independent claims against the elements of your proposed product or process. A patent is only infringed if your product meets every element of at least one claim. If any single claim element is missing from your product, that claim is not infringed. This element-by-element analysis is the technical core of any freedom-to-operate analysis.<\/p>\n
Even if a patent’s claims appear to read on your product, the patent may be invalid or unenforceable. Invalid patents cannot be enforced. The validity assessment considers whether there is prior art that was not cited during examination that could anticipate or render obvious the patent’s claims, whether the patent’s claims comply with the written description and enablement requirements, and whether the patent is subject to any pending challenges at the PTAB. Unenforceable patents may include those obtained through inequitable conduct \u2014 failure to disclose known prior art to the USPTO.<\/p>\n\n
A well-structured freedom-to-operate opinion categorizes identified patents by risk level to help clients prioritize their response. PerspireIP typically uses the following risk framework:<\/p>\n
When the freedom-to-operate analysis identifies high-risk patents, several strategies can mitigate the risk: designing around the patent by modifying the product to avoid at least one element of each problematic claim, licensing the patent through negotiation with the patent owner, challenging the patent through inter partes review or ex parte reexamination, waiting for the patent to expire (if the remaining term is short), or accepting the risk as manageable based on the patent owner’s likelihood of enforcement.<\/p>\n\n
PerspireIP provides comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis services across all technology sectors. Our FTO opinions are written by experienced patent attorneys with deep technical knowledge in the relevant fields, are thorough and well-documented, provide clear and actionable risk assessments, and include specific design-around or risk mitigation recommendations. We also provide ongoing FTO monitoring services to alert clients to newly issued patents that may create new infringement risk as their products evolve.<\/p>\n\n
A freedom-to-operate analysis is one of the most important IP risk management tools available to any company commercializing new products. By identifying potential patent infringement risks before product launch, you can take proactive steps to eliminate or mitigate those risks \u2014 saving potentially enormous litigation costs and disruption later. PerspireIP is here to help you navigate the patent landscape and commercialize your products with confidence. Contact us today to discuss your FTO analysis needs.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Before launching a new product or entering a new market, smart companies ask a critical legal question: are we free to operate? A freedom-to-operate analysis (FTO…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":509,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-409","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.perspireip.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/409","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.perspireip.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.perspireip.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.perspireip.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.perspireip.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=409"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.perspireip.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/409\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.perspireip.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/509"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.perspireip.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=409"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.perspireip.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=409"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.perspireip.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=409"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}